TechFold - Bold tech & web commentary
Bold tech & web commentary
TechFold is technology discussion, commentary, reviews, and opinions from well outside the valley. There's no koolaid to drink here, and TechFold is not in SL, or on Twitter.
Verified by who??! A letter to VISA.
Dear Visa,
Over the last few days I’ve spent many frustrating hours trying to book an AirAsia ticket over an hsdpa connection from a sandy tropical island. Not fun. Once the lethargic AirAsia site actually allowed me to book a ticket, the payment process was interrupted by something called “Verified by Visa” - a mysterious page at “securesite.com” that demanded that I register for the service, re-entering all of my contact info, showing my credit card details, etc. I have a few problems with this:
- The service died halfway through my “registration” leaving me at a blank screen with nowhere to go. No idea if the transaction went through and whether I had seats booked or not. I ended phoning from the mainland to find out.
- SecureSite.com?? I don’t know securesite.com from a hole in the ground. From my standpoint, all I’ve done is given yet another third party site all of my credit card details. Oh - I should trust it because there are Visa jpgs all over the place? Perhaps not.
- I can just imagine the dismal marketing meeting the resulted in the decision to use “securesite.com.”
- There’s no way to opt out of securesite.com or the Verified by Visa program that I could see.
So, in a nutshell, Visa’s program to make me feel safe (a) killed my transaction, (b) did so in a way that required phone calls to fix, and (c) made me feel less secure by dumping all of my info to yet another site that I don’t trust. Dear Visa: Please shut down the program until its ready for public use.
security visaIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
AT&T Protest Graphic for your blog, website, whatever
AT&T is stumbling through the Internet age with a stunning lack of foresight: in support of their TV offering, and to make friends with Hollywood, they’ve agreed to work towards actively scanning all AT&T network traffic for copywritten material.
I’m not going to go into the details. CenterNetworks, Uneasy Silence, Dave Winer, Techcrunch, Ars Technica, AllThingsDigital, and others have covered it exhaustively already.
I will, however, contribute a protest button/graphic/badge. Right-click & Save As, and deploy on your blog/website/tshirt/etc as you see fit. Link it back to whatever post, petition, goatse picture, or whatever you choose. Please don’t hotlink. Its a friendly png of 14kb in size, with a popular pop-culture reference to make it extra topical.

UPDATE: I took it down until I can figure out if the AT&T corporate logo can be used for critical purposes under the “fair use” clause without first seeking permission. I am a legal chicken-shit, yes.
UPDATE 2: What do you say - would it be covered under nominative use?
UPDATE 3: Removed literal trademark elements while retaining visual cues and tagline syntax. Should be legal, IMHO.
at&t, att, business models, censorship, copyright, copywrite, mpaa, protest, RIAA, security techmemeIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Akamai Real-time Web Traffic Monitor
This is pretty cool - check out Akamai’s realtime web monitor. It surfaces traffic, speed, and “attack” volume - showing you the pulse of the Internet, if you will. The FASTForward Blog covers this in more detail.
The CBC covers some interesting findings (found via Flying Hamster) that have popped out of the tool already. StreamingMedia.com covers more tools to be released by Akamai.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Subscribe to RSS Feed
Subscribe to TechFold RSS




