Subscribe to RSS Feed

TechFold is technology discussion, commentary, reviews, and opinions from well outside the valley. There's no koolaid to drink here, and TechFold is not in SL, or on Twitter.

My spare time TechMeme competitor

I have a rudimentary knowledge of a lot of things: statistics, programming theory, php, mysql, consumer behaviour, and so on. Individually, I’m an expert in none, and could not do any professionally to save my life. Taken as a package though, I know just enough info about just enough disciplines to have a little bit of fun.

In that vein, over the last week, while recovering from a flu/cold/lackofsleep, I glued together a clunky TechMeme competitor as a conceptual exercise for myself to see if I could apply the bits and pieces that I know to generate relevant results.

You can see the system’s (live) output here: http://hddb.net/techstream_index.html

(hddb.net is a different venture of mine, and a convenient development box)
(”techstream” is just my internal development prefix, not branding)

It refreshes every half hour, and as of right now, is actively following 167 blogs in the technology sector. It uses MagpieRSS to cache and check feeds, so hopefully if you’re on the list you’re not seeing weird spikes from hddb.net.

Once it picks up your post, it does a bunch of brute force, ugly stuff to it to try and place it in a larger context. It looks for other posts that yours links to, and other posts that link to yours. It splits up your post title into tags, and searches for other posts that share common tags. When all is said and done, it stitches together tag relevance, links to and from, how long the post has been kicking around, click-through popularity, etc, and through magic that I can’t even really follow any more, its spits out the output that you see.

The algorithm takes about a minute to run during low post volume times (like Sunday evenings), and swells to up to 5 minutes when the blogosphere is cooking.

The result? Not bad, IMHO. Its not as balanced as TechMeme, in that hot items will cling to the top of the page for longer than they should. The page is also longer than it should be. It also doesn’t have the breadth of TechMeme - I imagine Gabe’s algorithm is following more that 167 posts. I’m also manually adding feeds - one of TechMeme’s greatest strengths is that it (I think) picks up new blogs to follow automatically, based on link volumes that it sees. I’d like to get there eventually. I’m also missing any RSS output - there’s nothing to subscribe to yet, and I’m not even sure what form such a subscription would take (I’ve never really followed TechMeme’s bulk feed output).

Anyway, enjoy. Your thoughts/comments/etc. are welcome. If you’d like your blog added to the index, let me know.

, ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

For love of money: the death of the blogosphere

Scobleizer chimes in after the Federated Media / Microsoft dustup over the weekend, asking why its “ok” for some tech-pundit types to sell their voices and not for others. Roberts asks the key question: would Leo Laporte be talking about GoToMyPC if they weren’t paying him? Likely not.

Blogging and the blogosphere began with an implicit promise: that those who participated did so for the love of their community and interests, not for a paycheck, and that what they wrote was an honest snapshot of their opinions.

That promise defined the blogosphere: it created a fifth estate characterized by passion, opinions, and a chorus of overlapping, contradictory views - all in marked contrast to the dry, “objective,” produced mainstream media. That promise has encouraged millions to join “the” conversation as authors, free to be honest to themselves; those honest author’s personalities, opinions, and insights have created the world’s biggest reader base.

There are successful bloggers out there, however, that seem to have lost sight of what it means to be a blogger - presumably swept up in the opportunities of success. Can Leo Laporte sell his voice? Sure - I consider him MSM, living principally in TV and Radio, and thus compromised by the very nature of those industries. Can Michael A. and Om Malik shill whatever they want? Sure - go ahead. But when you do, your failing yourself and your readers, breaking the promise that you made to the blogosphere to speak your mind - not advertiser’s. Its disappointing to see.

, , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Staying on TechMeme

Huh. Looks like I’m de-listed from TechMeme - again. TechMeme seems to drop sites from its “to-index” list if you don’t link to other stories that get on TechMeme regularly. To be honest, I don’t really like that - it increases the feedback loop that clusters blog posts around whatever the two or three hot topics of the day may be. That decreases the breadth of stories that get written as writers are encouraged to write on TechMeme’d topics and discouraged from writing on others. Of course it also decreases the breadth of stories that hit TechMeme.

Of course no one should be writing “for” TechMeme - but TechMeme to some degree has come to define what’s “topical” in the tech blogosphere. I think Gabe R. would state that TechMeme just chronicles the discussion taking place, but I’d argue that by virtue of existing, TechMeme is influencing. The traffic that TechMeme can deliver provides motivation to write on stories that are on TechMeme - making it an active part of the blogosphere - not an impartial observer. I’ve certainly written posts on TechMeme-listed news expressly to get traffic - and have been rewarded for it with nice spikes.

Over the past two weeks, however, I’ve been actively trying to read TechMeme less, so as to get out of the topics that bloggers flock to and focus writing on what really interests myself and hopefully TechFold readers. The hope is that in creating a blog with a personality of its own, as opposed to just a reflection of What’s Hot on TechMeme, will in the long run garner this site more & more dedicated readership.

Thoughts? Please share.

,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Thanks, priestofmemory: the “Civil Anyway” Badge

Blogger priestofmemory has a great post about the ongoing Blogger Code of Conduct flap. He’s of the same mind as yours truly on the issue, and was kind enough to create a badge to symbolize his adherence to a reasonable, un-regulated, self-applied code of conduct: no nanny badges, just a declaration that you’re an intelligent, reasonable, non-troll.

I wear the badge at the top of my right-hand column. If you’d like to do the same, warm up your right-click-save as - here’s the badge:

And feel free to link it to:

http://techfold.com/2007/04/09/an-alternative-to-oreillys-politeness-manifesto-the-un-code/

…which is where priestofmemory pointed his, or:

http://priestofmemory.livejournal.com/57566.html

…which is his post.

Either way, the message gets across that its OK to be a nice normal person without adhereing to anyone’s arbitrary assumptions of what “nice” and “normal” are. Just to quote quickly from my original post, here’s my “Simple Test” declaration:

THE BLOGGERS CODE OF CONDUCT: A Simple Test

1. “Do online as you would in person.”
Before every post or comment you make, ask yourself whether you would be comfortable shouting it out loud from a well-lit lectern in an auditorium full of 300 people that included, friends, family, and a whole lot of strangers. If the answer is “No,” revise and retest before posting.

, , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

An Alternative to O’Reilly’s Politeness Manifesto: The Un-Code

As Mike A. lines out effectively on CrunchNotes, the stink around the Sierra blog attacks from a week or two ago is now being perpetuated by Tim O’Reilly, who has surfaced a fluff-ridden “Blogger’s Code of Conduct.”

Out of all of the huggable, do-gooder posturing in the Code, there’s only one line that really makes any sense: “We won’t say anything online that we wouldn’t say in person.” That is to say, don’t be an jerk in your posts or in your comments. Or, if you are, expect to be banned/ostracized/etc. the same way you would be in the RW.

Other notions about banning anonymous comments, chasing commenters to get them to apologize to each other (puh-leez), aim to do nothing more than turn the blogosphere into the same padded, supervised, politically correct, injury free, la-la-la happy land that has replaced school playgrounds. For crying out loud, let’s put on our adult-hats, take the good with the bad, and move on with a newfound sense of awareness that (a) there are jerks on the internet and you probably don’t want to be one, and (b) the web community is very effective at calling out jerks without the need for codes of conduct.

Of course, I certainly don’t condone what happened to Sierra or any reprehensible behaviour like what took place in that context. Nor, however, do I think the appropriate response is the nanny-fication of the blogosphere or the introduction of a vigalante politeness corps. Instead, I propose a revised manifesto, based on O’Reilly’s pt. 4, like this:

THE BLOGGERS CODE OF CONDUCT: A Simple Test

1. “Do online as you would in person.”
Before every post or comment you make, ask yourself whether you would be comfortable shouting it out loud from a well-lit lectern in an auditorium full of 300 people that included, friends, family, and a whole lot of strangers. If the answer is “No,” revise and retest before posting.

I think that really sums it up. It leaves plenty of room for freedom of speech, and leaves “regulation” in the hands of individual bloggers and readers. That is to say, if you’re comfortable shouting out offensive stuff in a roomful of people, expect to be heckled, and then the auditorium to empty quickly.

, , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Close
E-mail It