TechFold - Bold tech & web commentary

Bold tech & web commentary

TechFold is technology discussion, commentary, reviews, and opinions from well outside the valley. There's no koolaid to drink here, and TechFold is not in SL, or on Twitter.

An Alternative to O’Reilly’s Politeness Manifesto: The Un-Code

As Mike A. lines out effectively on CrunchNotes, the stink around the Sierra blog attacks from a week or two ago is now being perpetuated by Tim O’Reilly, who has surfaced a fluff-ridden “Blogger’s Code of Conduct.”

Out of all of the huggable, do-gooder posturing in the Code, there’s only one line that really makes any sense: “We won’t say anything online that we wouldn’t say in person.” That is to say, don’t be an jerk in your posts or in your comments. Or, if you are, expect to be banned/ostracized/etc. the same way you would be in the RW.

Other notions about banning anonymous comments, chasing commenters to get them to apologize to each other (puh-leez), aim to do nothing more than turn the blogosphere into the same padded, supervised, politically correct, injury free, la-la-la happy land that has replaced school playgrounds. For crying out loud, let’s put on our adult-hats, take the good with the bad, and move on with a newfound sense of awareness that (a) there are jerks on the internet and you probably don’t want to be one, and (b) the web community is very effective at calling out jerks without the need for codes of conduct.

Of course, I certainly don’t condone what happened to Sierra or any reprehensible behaviour like what took place in that context. Nor, however, do I think the appropriate response is the nanny-fication of the blogosphere or the introduction of a vigalante politeness corps. Instead, I propose a revised manifesto, based on O’Reilly’s pt. 4, like this:

THE BLOGGERS CODE OF CONDUCT: A Simple Test

1. “Do online as you would in person.”
Before every post or comment you make, ask yourself whether you would be comfortable shouting it out loud from a well-lit lectern in an auditorium full of 300 people that included, friends, family, and a whole lot of strangers. If the answer is “No,” revise and retest before posting.

I think that really sums it up. It leaves plenty of room for freedom of speech, and leaves “regulation” in the hands of individual bloggers and readers. That is to say, if you’re comfortable shouting out offensive stuff in a roomful of people, expect to be heckled, and then the auditorium to empty quickly.

blogging, blogosphere, blogs, locke, oreilly sierra

6 Responses to “An Alternative to O’Reilly’s Politeness Manifesto: The Un-Code”

Jonathan Marks | April 9th, 2007 at 4:20 pm

Bravo. I don’t need a badge on my website to show I’m doing the right thing - too many overtowns of the US cop series that plague our TV networks here in the Netherlands. Your simple statement of a code of ethics is right to the point.
Rod | April 9th, 2007 at 5:12 pm

Thanks for the comment, Jonathan! The whole code-of-conduct thing appears to be a well-intentioned overreaction to a problem that doesn’t really exist.
Jonathan Marks | April 9th, 2007 at 5:19 pm

Hi Rob,

I agree. However, I have been thinking of making a journalistic code that I stick to when posting on my blogs (checking facts, etc) since I do have people asking what my interests are - and why I don’t carry advertising. Its more like a promise to readers. I am all for transparency in declaring interests. More useful that saying I’m part of a police force.
yarvin | April 10th, 2007 at 11:17 am

What O’Reilly thinks is reasonable conduct and what I think is reasonable conduct aren’t necessarily the same thing. What he seems to be trying to do is make adherence to his Code expected, and I think that’s unreasonable.
Thanks, priestofmemory: the “Civil Anyway” Badge « TechFold | April 10th, 2007 at 12:42 pm

[…] has a great post about the ongoing Blogger Code of Conduct flap. He’s of the same mind as yours truly on the issue, and was kind enough to create a badge to symbolize his adherence to a reasonable, un-regulated, […]
Rod | April 10th, 2007 at 12:54 pm

Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Yarvin. Agreed - the mob mentality that TO wants to stir up won’t do the blogosphere any favours in the long run, other than homogenizing it to the gray inoffensive good that characterized our mainstream media. Vive la difference!

This fellow shares our similar thinking as well, and made a badge to confirm that he’s “civil” on his own terms:

http://priestofmemory.livejournal.com/57566.html